Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Inner Circle > The Riverside Inn

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Aug 31, 2010, 05:37 AM // 05:37   #61
Desert Nomad
 
jazilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Guild: Guernsey Milking Coalition[MiLk]
Profession: E/Me
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

stuff from the old days before the official wiki is better on wikia. in a post eotn world, wiki works.
jazilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 31, 2010, 04:36 PM // 16:36   #62
rattus rattus
 
Snograt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, UK GMT±0 ±1hr DST
Guild: [GURU]GW [wiki]GW2
Profession: R/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fenix View Post
I refuse to use the 'official' wiki out of principle. Wikis are NOT DISCUSSION FORUMS. Since the Devs insist on using them as such, I insist on using the other wiki.
Sorry Feen - couldn't let this one pass.

A "discussion forum" is one of the many things that Wikipedia "is not." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikiped...kipedia_is_not). That's Wikipedia.

A wiki can be for whatever you want to use it, and in this case the devs like to discuss stuff.
__________________
Si non confectus, non reficiat
Snograt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 31, 2010, 05:50 PM // 17:50   #63
Site Contributor
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Default

Snograt, I think he was referring more to the fact that wiki's are terrible means of communication because by their very nature they are not set up to "chat" or discuss. They are there for knowledge, to be an encyclopedia. There's no flow to a conversations on the wiki and is incredibly hard to use for that purpose. But technically, yes, you can use a wiki for what you'd like. Doesn't make it a good solution though.
Inde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 31, 2010, 07:49 PM // 19:49   #64
rattus rattus
 
Snograt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: London, UK GMT±0 ±1hr DST
Guild: [GURU]GW [wiki]GW2
Profession: R/
Default

Heh, just me then. I was with the official wiki from the start, so I guess I'm just used to that as a medium of communication
__________________
Si non confectus, non reficiat
Snograt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 01, 2010, 05:05 PM // 17:05   #65
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Guild: farm
Profession: R/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wynthyst View Post
I'm not sure how you can go to the main page of the official wiki and miss the box that's titled Latest In Game Activities that lists the Zquests and Nick stuff as well as the Wanted by Shining Blade quests, with a prominent link to the full schedule. http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/Daily_activities
My Bad, guess I just never hovered over the hyperlink text "… other days" on the main page to learn THAT is the link to the URL with the schedule. I mean, why would I expect the hyperlink text to be something like... oh I don't know... "schedule" ?

Anyway TY
doomfodder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 02, 2010, 05:51 AM // 05:51   #66
Site Contributor
 
Wynthyst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Guild: Gems of Destiny
Profession: D/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snograt View Post
A wiki can be for whatever you want to use it, and in this case the devs like to discuss stuff.
Actually Snog, the devs don't really like to discuss stuff, they just prefer to post the information that is and watch the shit hit the fan on the forums

The wiki is the perfect vehicle for this
__________________
Wynthyst
Wynthyst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 02, 2010, 06:00 AM // 06:00   #67
Site Contributor
 
Wynthyst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Guild: Gems of Destiny
Profession: D/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dancing gnome View Post
I prefer it simply because it was run and continues to be run by people who place the wiki before their own egos and it focuses on the community, not the egos of the admin. The official wiki is full of self obsessed admin that love edrama, power and brown nosing ArenaNet instead of actually documenting the game. Not only do they have trolls on their admin staff but they also actively argue against adding content to the wiki based on policy (or personal) reasons which make no sense.
.
If you want to talk wiki history, the people who set up and ran GuildWiki in the beginning are pretty much the exact same people who set up the Official Wiki when ArenaNet opted to create it, since that's who Anet turned to for help. There are still admins on GWW from that time period in fact. So.. that being said, I don't see your reasoning as valid in that regard. As far as documenting the game, I don't think you will find many on GWW (admin or not) that would block the addition of any information that is actually documenting the game. There are policies that have been developed by the community that contributors are asked to follow when adding documentation, but I've not found much opposition to creating pages that don't exist, or adding documentary information to pages that are already there.
__________________
Wynthyst
Wynthyst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 02, 2010, 12:27 PM // 12:27   #68
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Morphy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Guild: Not going to keep up with that anymore
Profession: R/
Default

Tbh, I consider a wiki a better tool for discussion than a forum.
Morphy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:36 AM // 03:36.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
jQuery(document).ready(checkAds()); function checkAds(){if (document.getElementById('adsense')!=undefined){document.write("_gaq.push(['_trackEvent', 'Adblock', 'Unblocked', 'false',,true]);");}else{document.write("